As Transparency Initiative Adds Countries, Global Coalition Calls for Civil Society Engagement and Reform
Free-Riding No Longer an Option
Accra –Governments and companies signed up to the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) must now deliver concrete results towards making revenues and payments from oil, gas and mining transparent and accountable, said the global civil society coalition Publish What You Pay (PWYP). Seven resource-rich countries were approved as EITI candidates by the EITI Board in Accra, Ghana on Friday, February 22, bringing the total number of EITI candidate countries to 22.
"We will hold all candidate countries to the same standard of civil society engagement in the EITI implementation and validation process," said Bennett Freeman, an EITI Board member representing Oxfam America and Oxfam International. "In some countries in particular, fundamental reforms will be necessary to allow civil society to play its rightful role as envisioned by the EITI."
The seven new candidate countries are: the Democratic Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Madagascar, the Republic of Congo, Sao Tome and Principe, Sierra Leone and Timor-Leste.
"Companies, too, need to step up to the plate and fulfil their end of the bargain," said Corinna Gilfillan of Global Witness. "It is unacceptable that only 3 of the 37 oil, gas and mining companies that have endorsed the EITI have complied with the requirement to report on steps taken to meet the EITI transparency principles." These three companies are Royal Dutch Shell, Chevron and StatoilHydro.
PWYP called on governments to move forward swiftly with implementation, and urged the EITI to carefully monitor country progress and to provide the necessary support and technical assistance. All countries have a two-year period in which to become validated as fully compliant with the EITI criteria or face losing their candidate status.
"The focus must be on deliverables now," said Carlos Monge of Peruvian NGO Grupo Propuesta Ciudadana, and a member of the EITI Board. "We don't want a situation where countries free-ride and use the EITI label to continue business-as-usual. Concrete steps should be taken towards implementation and regular monitoring of country work plans, starting immediately."
PWYP also welcomed the creation of an EITI working group to develop effective EITI responses in instances when civil society participation is threatened.
"Transparency activists, including some EITI Board members, have faced threats, harassment and, in some cases, even imprisonment in places such as Gabon, Angola, and the Republic of Congo," said Radhika Sarin, International Coordinator of PWYP. "Civil society participation is intrinsic to the EITI process, and the EITI must have a zero-tolerance policy on this critical issue."
ABOUT PUBLISH WHAT YOU PAY AND EITI
PWYP is a global coalition of over 300 civil society organisations campaigning for transparency and accountability in the extractive industries. PWYP is represented on the multi-stakeholder EITI Board through various member organisations, such as Oxfam, Global Witness, Grupo Propuesta Ciudadana, La Rencontre pour la Paix et les Droits de l'Homme, and Secours Catholique.
In September 2007, the following countries were accepted as EITI Candidate Countries: Azerbaijan, Cameroon, Gabon, Ghana, Guinea, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Liberia, Mali, Mauritania, Mongolia, Niger, Nigeria, Peru, and Yemen. To achieve candidate status, the host government must issue a public statement of intent, commitment to work with civil society and companies, appoint a senior individual lead, and to produce a fully costed, published workplan agreed with other stakeholders.
To become fully compliant, a country needs to sign up, prepare, disclose and disseminate information on all the material revenues received by the government from the oil, gas and mining sectors with the full engagement of other stakeholders in that country. At present, no country has been formally validated as EITI compliant, though several countries have advanced processes.
For more about EITI, please visit www.eitransparency.org.
CONTACTS
Radhika Sarin (in Accra): +44 (0) 7976 589 179
Bennett Freeman (in the US): +1 202 262 5116
Carlos Monge (in Peru): +51 19145240
Corinna Gilfillan (in Accra): +44 (0) 7969 652 825
U.S. Said to Allow Drilling Without Needed Permits - The New York Times
Australia Gas Deal Renews Tension - Financial Times
Charged With Fraud, Nigeria's Ruling Party Leader Resigns - Reuters
Western Senators Propose Ban on Pacific Drilling - The New York Times
To Limit Corruption around Mining in Africa, Follow the Money - The Globe and Mail
Court Backs Oil Project - The New York Times
Transparency Increases, But There Is Still a Long Way to Go - The Phnom Penh Post
IMF Develops Project to Help Africa Deal with Illicit Trade - African Manager
Three-day Conference on Africa's Natural Resources Starts in Tanzania - Standard Times Press
After Oil Rig Blast, BP Refused to Share Underwater Spill Footage - ABC News
Finger-Pointing, but Few Answers at Hearings on Drilling - The New York Times
Complaints Over U.N. Prize Sponsored by Equatorial Guinea's Obiang - Reuters
Guide: Community-Company Grievance Resolution for Australian Mining Industry - Oxfam Australia (pdf)
Cote D'Ivoire: President for Life, and Then Some - The New York Times
In Midst of Massive Spill, Oil Industry Fighting Transparency and Accountability - Oxfam America
Leaked Oil Contracts in DRC Threaten Resource Wars and $10 Billion Rip-Off by British Company - Carbon Web
Contracts Confidential: Ending Secret Deals in the Extractive Industries
Contract transparency is sorely needed to improve the management of natural resource wealth. In a new report from RWI, authors Peter Rosenblum and Susan Maples delve into government and private sector objections to contract disclosure and make conclusions about what information may legitimately and reasonably be kept confidential, and how civil society institutions can better confront the challenge of secret deals.
Learn more about the report ...
NEW TRANSLATION: Revenue Redistribution at the Local Level
Many resource-rich countries are attempting to compensate their producing regions through shares of resource revenues to be spent at the local level. In "Extractive Industries Revenues Distribution at the Sub-National Level," development economics consultant Matteo Morgandi presents a comparative analysis of international legislation for distribution of extractive revenues from across all levels of government. Prepared at the request of the Peruvian National Congress, the report studies the legislative practices of seven resource-rich countries to identify potential and address challenges. Please note that this report is now also available in Vietnamese.
Learn more ...
